Invoices arrive in scattered channels
Finance has to check emails, PDFs, supplier portals, drive folders, and chat threads before the real work starts.
Last updated: November 2026
Your accounts payable software may already hold the invoices, but someone still has to find missing details and chase approvals. Rebotify checks invoice information, flags mismatches and prepares follow-up emails and coding notes. Your finance team reviews the work and keeps control of approvals and payment.
Describe how invoices arrive and where approval slows down. Our team will reply within one business day.
Where the work gets stuck
Choose one recurring task with clear examples and someone responsible for reviewing the work.
Invoices arrive in scattered channels
Finance has to check emails, PDFs, supplier portals, drive folders, and chat threads before the real work starts.
Approvers get incomplete requests
The same missing details keep delaying payment decisions and creating back-and-forth.
Exceptions take the most time
Simple invoices are easy; mismatched suppliers, unclear purchase orders, and unusual terms need judgment.
What your team receives
Finance staff receive the invoice details and supporting documents together, with missing information and mismatches flagged.
Invoices arrive with extracted fields, source files, and missing details already flagged.
Approvers receive the supplier context, amount, due date, and specific decision needed.
Duplicates, mismatches, changed details, and missing references surface before payment review.
Work in motion
Week-one outputs. Drafted for review before send.
EXAMPLE · 01
Read new supplier invoices, extract fields, identify missing details, and prepare the approval request.
EXAMPLE · 02
Compare invoice details against a purchase order (PO) or project record and flag mismatches before approval.
EXAMPLE · 03
Summarize stale invoices, missing approvals, and exceptions that need action before close.
Tasks we can help with
The employee reads invoices from email or folders and extracts the fields the finance team actually checks.
Supplier, ABN or tax ID, due date, amount, purchase order, bank details, and missing attachments can be checked before review.
Approvers receive a clear summary, source file, prior context, and the specific decision needed.
Unclear, duplicate, or policy-sensitive invoices go to the right reviewer instead of sitting in a general inbox.
Human control
The first workflow prepares and checks the work; payment actions can remain gated behind existing finance controls.
The employee can surface suspicious repeats, changed bank details, and conflicting invoice information for review.
Each prepared item includes the source document and the checks applied so finance can verify quickly.
When another approach may fit better
What to measure
Invoice automation needs structured data, exception handling, and finance controls before payment is touched.
Claim boundary
We do not claim fully touchless payment, universal fast payment, ATO visibility into invoice contents, or guaranteed savings.
Reference point
The ATO describes lower processing cost for eInvoices and notes internal checks still apply before payment.
Reference point
ATO guidance describes Peppol eInvoicing as direct structured data exchange between buyer and supplier software.
Reference point
OpenPeppol documents the interoperability framework and invoice specifications that support automated processing.
Use these four questions to choose a starting task. Send us an enquiry to discuss the cost, risks and approvals it would need.
We’ll discuss whether an AI employee or a person is better suited to the task.
WORK SCORECARD
Four questions about the work, its cost, the result you need and who approves it.
Work
Replies, reports, document requests, checks, approvals or follow-ups your team repeats.
Cost
Staff time, manager attention, customer wait time, rework, missed follow-ups, or lost revenue.
Quality
More useful drafts, faster replies, fewer errors or clearer information for the next person.
Control
Customer promises, pricing, refunds, legal language, financial decisions, or anything that can damage trust.
Use your answers to discuss the task, pricing and a small first test with our team.
Invoice processing automation reads incoming invoices, extracts required fields, checks vendor and purchase-order context, prepares approval packets, and routes exceptions. Payment release should stay behind the company’s existing finance controls unless explicitly approved.
Xero and QuickBooks handle the ledger side — coding, GST, and payment. Rebotify adds the layer in front of that: reading a supplier invoice out of an inbox, chasing the missing purchase order, and drafting the approval request with context attached, scoped to the ledger you already run.
Invoice automation focuses on intake, extraction, validation, and approval routing. AP automation is broader: vendor records, purchase orders, approvals, payments, reconciliation, and audit trails. Rebotify usually starts with invoice intake before broader AP change.
It can flag likely duplicates and changed bank details for a human to check, the same kind of control AP automation platforms describe. It is a flag, not a guarantee — the approver still makes the call before anything is paid.
Yes, if the first workflow is scoped. An AI employee can read invoices from email or folders, check required details, attach source files, and prepare approval requests inside tools finance already uses.
Humans should review payment release, changed bank details, mismatched purchase orders, duplicate invoices, unusual terms, and anything outside the approved finance policy.
Related pages
Browse all servicesCRM workflow automation
Customer service automation
Managed AI
Managed AI for accountants
Describe how invoices arrive and where approval slows down.
Our team will reply within one business day.