Owner
Estimator, project manager, commercial lead, or operations owner trying to protect margin and bid discipline.
RFQs slip when vendors go quiet and managers do not have a clean comparison.
Mia chases responses, organizes quotes, and flags the decision needed.
Send the RFQ thread.
Mia maps the first subcontractor chase, attachment, due-date, and review-pack loop.
The employee runs inside the systems you already use.
The point is less manual work, not another app to manage.
If your stack is different, it almost certainly connects too. See the directory →
Construction teams handling RFQs, subcontractor pricing, drawing revisions, and change-order context.
Owner
Estimator, project manager, commercial lead, or operations owner trying to protect margin and bid discipline.
Workday sentence
Who still owes pricing, which drawing revision did they price, and what changed in the scope?
Where it gets stuck
RFQs and changes are scattered across emails, PDFs, drawings, spreadsheets, and phone notes while due dates keep moving.
What cannot go wrong
The team prices the wrong scope, misses a subcontractor quote, or loses margin because the audit trail is weak.
What stays human
They protect site knowledge, commercial judgment, and disciplined quoting.
They do not want AI interpreting scope alone.
First useful version
A live RFQ chase board with missing prices, source-linked attachments, quote deltas, and a review packet for the PM.
Mia is useful only if this work gets cheaper, faster, cleaner, or easier to trust.
She handles prep, drafts, chases, and handoffs.
Your team keeps the decision.
Work to clear
RFQ status board with missing pricing, overdue responses, and source links
Impact
Faster turnaround, fewer dropped handoffs, clearer updates, and less manager attention spent chasing status.
Current cost
RFQ emails, bid packages, drawings, specifications, attachments, and due dates
Human approval
Project managers, estimators, or commercial leads approve quote interpretation, subcontractor communication, and change-order decisions.
Construction admin gets expensive when RFQs, change-order context, attachments, and subcontractor replies are split across emails, PDFs, spreadsheets, and phone notes.
This AI employee keeps the thread alive, chases missing pricing, and prepares the packet for human approval.
“Three subcontractors have not priced the revised scope. The AI employee drafts the chase, attaches the right drawing revision, and gives the PM a review packet by 2pm.”
Unstick tenant maintenance tickets by triaging the request, chasing vendor ETAs, drafting tenant updates, and preparing owner-ready summaries.
Turn one referral into a booked visit by chasing missing forms, checking admin gates, and routing the file for human review.
Surface what needs you.
Kill the noise.
Draft the rest in your voice.
The chief of staff you couldn’t hire.
Meeting prep, action capture, weekly cadence — owned end to end.
Mia checks the cost, risk, approval line, and whether an AI employee can clear the first version.
If this is cheaper or safer with a person, the scorecard says that.
WORK + APPROVAL SCORECARD
A short check for cost, speed, quality, risk, and the first safe version.
Work
Replies, reports, checks, handoffs, document chases, approvals, or follow-up that keeps coming back.
Cost
Staff time, manager attention, customer wait time, rework, missed follow-ups, or lost revenue.
Quality
Better drafts, faster turnaround, fewer errors, cleaner handoffs, and less chasing from managers.
Control
Customer promises, pricing, refunds, legal language, financial decisions, or anything that can damage trust.
Output: work to clear, current cost, approval line, pricing shape, and the smallest useful test.
Send the RFQ thread.
Mia maps the first subcontractor chase, attachment, due-date, and review-pack loop.