A leading Australian provider of online higher education.
Deeper answers, customised pathways, better experience for every prospect. The advisors who used to type the same unit explanations now spend the day on the conversations that need them.
Mia is our AI employee. Email her — she’ll book your 15-minute call. That’s the demo.
A leading Australian provider of online higher education.
Deeper answers, customised pathways, better experience for every prospect. The advisors who used to type the same unit explanations now spend the day on the conversations that need them.
What moved
CSAT & prospect experience
The quality of every first reply
Response time
24+ hrs → under 1 min
On routine course questions
After-hours coverage
70–80%
Of off-hours enquiries handled by next morning
Advisor capacity
25–40% freed
For the cases that need real judgement
Prospective students asked the questions that actually decide enrolments. “What does this unit actually teach me?” “How does it set me up for the one after?” “Which of these three units gives me the strongest base in data analytics — and what’s the trade-off between them?” “I’ve got a diploma from ten years ago and a full-time job — can I make this work?”
The questions deserved depth. The advisor team was fielding hundreds of them a week — under load, on a deadline, often after-hours. The replies that went out were honest but uneven. Some prospects got a paragraph that genuinely explained the unit’s place in their pathway; others got a sentence and a catalogue link. The depth of the first reply was set by how busy the advisor was that morning.
A course advisor.
Scoped to first-touch deep explanation and pathway customisation. No formal credit assessment, no admission decisions, no current-student support.
Connections
- Full course catalogue, including unit syllabi and learning outcomes
- Prerequisite and pathway maps across partner universities
- Career-pathway documents
- Prior enquiry history and CRM context
- House voice samples — what good advisor replies actually read like
- Read the prospect’s stated goal, prior study, and constraints (time, mode, budget)
- Explain each relevant unit at the depth the question deserves — what it teaches, what skills it builds, how it connects to the next unit
- Propose one to three customised pathways with trade-offs surfaced — fastest, most credentialled, most working-friendly
- Flag any eligibility, credit, or RPL signal and route to a named advisor
- Surface to the advisor with the draft pre-loaded for review
The explanations were too long. First-cut replies went deep on every unit — six paragraphs where the prospect wanted the right two. Depth was the right instinct, breadth was the wrong default.
The rule changed: explanations are tiered. A tight summary of each unit with the why-this-fits line for the prospect’s specific goal, then an “want more on this one?” expansion link the prospect can pull on. Depth on demand, not depth by default. The reply quality scores moved the same week.
- Formal RPL and credit assessment
- Admission and scholarship conversations
- Career-change consultations where the prospect needs a real adviser, not a pathway
- Hardship, fee assistance, and special access cases
- The judgement call on whether a degree is the right answer at all
- Reading the prospect’s question at the depth it deserves
- Explaining units and pathways at the right level — not too shallow, not too long
- Proposing customised options with trade-offs named
- Routing eligibility and credit signals to the right advisor
- Logging the enquiry, the pathway, and the prospect’s stated constraints
Outcomes track what published higher-education AI deployments report: response times measured in seconds for routine enquiries, 70–80% of after-hours questions cleared before the next morning, and 25–40% of advisor capacity returned to the cases — career changers, RPL, hardship — that needed it.
- Confirm credit or RPL. That assessment is formal and comes from a human.
- Promise an admission outcome. The employee can describe pathways; admission belongs to the institution.
- Quote fee assistance, scholarship, or special-access eligibility.
- Touch current-student support. Different queue, different rules.
- Send anything without review. Every draft pauses for an advisor.
Advisors now spend their time on the conversations that actually need them — career changers asking whether the degree is even the right answer, prospects with complex prior study who need real RPL guidance, the cases where the question behind the question matters more than the question itself. The unit-explanation work that used to fill the morning arrives sorted, drafted, and pitched at the right depth. The judgement work is the day.
Enquiry #6022 — career-change to data analytics, prior diploma 2014, working full-time. Drafted three pathways (fastest / most credentialled / working-friendly). Each unit explained at summary depth with expand-on-request. RPL signal on the diploma — flagged to Daniel, holding off send.
Other deployments on the same operating model.
Energy · legal & regulatory drafting
A tier-1 Australian energy retailer.
Documents that used to take days now ship in under an hour. The in-house legal and regulatory team reviews and revises instead of retyping.
Read the caseTelecommunications · chat triage
The national telecommunications carrier of a small island nation.
A thousand customer chats a day, moved through the day instead of building. Agents open each chat to a pre-built brief, not an empty draft.
Read the caseBring us one workflow. We will name the employee in 48 hours.
Mia is our AI employee. Email her — she’ll book your 15-minute call. That’s the demo.